Category Archives: centre-periphery relations

Videos of Naseby and House of Lords UNHRC Debate, 5 February 2019

Videos of Naseby’s UNHRC Debate 05/02/19

Lord Naseby
Lord Framlingham

Continue reading

1 Comment

Filed under accountability, centre-periphery relations, conspiracies, foreign policy, governance, historical interpretation, landscape wondrous, legal issues, life stories, politIcal discourse, power politics, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, sri lankan society, Tamil migration, the imaginary and the real, truth as casualty of war, UN reports, unusual people, vengeance, world events & processes

A Landmark in Ceylon’s Cricket Test History: Beating India in January 1965

Nirgunan Tiruchelvam, in ESPNcricinfo in 2013 — 14 August 2013 to be precise — with this heading “When the Lankans won a ‘Test’ in India”

Sri Lanka’s rise in Test cricket is one of the finest underdog stories in the game’s history. England have played Test cricket for 126 years, while Sri Lanka have only competed for 31. Yet Sri Lanka has two batsmen with 10,000 Test runs while England have none. Sri Lanka have also produced the game’s highest wicket-taker: Muttiah Muralitharan’s career haul of 800 is more than double the tally of England’s leading bowler (Ian Botham with 383).

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under centre-periphery relations, cricket for amity, cultural transmission, governance, heritage, historical interpretation, landscape wondrous, life stories, performance, politIcal discourse, Sri Lankan cricket, sri lankan society, world events & processes

Gamage reveals USA’s Strategic Goals in the Indian Ocean and Sri Lanka’s Place via 2007 Robert Blake Cables

Daya Gamage in Asian Tribune, 12 February 2019, where the title is

The Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreement (ACSA) signed between the Governments of Sri Lanka and the United States in March 2007 which allowed both countries to transfer and exchange logistics supplies, support, and re-fueling services clearly benefitted the United States in its military operation in the Asia-Pacific region – specifically US Pacific Command (USPACOM) which is now US Indo-Pacific Command (USINDOPACOM) – but left Sri Lanka with absolutely no benefit from the U.S. at a time Sri Lanka was in an intense military battle with the separatist Tamil Tigers.

 Sri Lanka’s Defense Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa (2005-2015) and U.S. Ambassador to Sri Lanka (2006-2009) Robert Blake in a conversation in Colombo during the time the 2007 military agreement was signed Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under accountability, Al Qaeda, american imperialism, centre-periphery relations, China and Chinese influences, economic processes, foreign policy, governance, historical interpretation, Indian Ocean politics, landscape wondrous, law of armed conflict, LTTE, military strategy, politIcal discourse, power politics, Rajapaksa regime, security, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, slanted reportage, sri lankan society, terrorism, the imaginary and the real, transport and communications, truth as casualty of war, war reportage, world events & processes

UK confirms Pursuit of UNHRC Vendetta: Naseby Motion Rejected

Item in The Island, 8 February 2019, entitled UK demands full implementation of Geneva Resolutions on Lanka …Says US pullout from Geneva body irrelevant

The UK government has again dismissed Lord Naseby’s call to terminate Geneva Resolution 30/1 in 2015 and Resolution 34/1 in 2017 on the basis that the then President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s government didn’t perpetrate war crimes as alleged by the UN. Minister of State, Foreign and Commonwealth Office Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon (Con) on Wednesday (Feb. 05) during a House of Commons debate on UNHRC Resolution declared that the UK expected the full implementation of both Resolutions.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under accountability, authoritarian regimes, British imperialism, centre-periphery relations, conspiracies, disparagement, doctoring evidence, foreign policy, governance, historical interpretation, human rights, life stories, LTTE, politIcal discourse, power politics, self-reflexivity, sri lankan society, the imaginary and the real, truth as casualty of war, UN reports, vengeance, world events & processes

Naseby on the Hands Off Sri Lanka Warpath: TWO

House of Lords-Feb 5, 2019: Debate on Sri Lanka’s UNHRC Resolution …..https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2019-02-05/debates/2E1B15B0-E8D5-42AF-B53C-240E0473212C/SriLanka

Lord Naseby =  To ask Her Majesty’s Government, following the resignation of the government of the United States from the United Nations Human Rights Council where they co-sponsored with the United Kingdom Resolution 30/1 in 2015 and Resolution 34/1 in 2017, in regard to Sri Lanka, and given the progress made towards many aspects highlighted in the resolutions, what assessment they have made of whether to annul or withdraw those resolutions.

Lord Naseby (Con): My Lords, it is my privilege to introduce this debate this evening. In doing so, I declare an interest in that I started the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sri Lanka in 1975 and had the privilege of being made its honorary president four years ago.

aa naseby in thupahi

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under accountability, centre-periphery relations, communal relations, cultural transmission, democratic measures, ethnicity, landscape wondrous, legal issues, life stories, LTTE, modernity & modernization, politIcal discourse, power politics, reconciliation, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, social justice, sri lankan society, Tamil civilians, tamil refugees, truth as casualty of war, unusual people, vengeance, war reportage, welfare & philanthophy, world events & processes

Naseby on the Hands Off Sri Lanka Warpath: ONE

Item in Sri Lanka Guardian, 5 February 2019, entitled “Sri Lanka: Time to stand her own two feet”

Is this really a country that has to be monitored by the West almost every day? The President of the APPG on Sri Lanka thinks not.

About 6 months ago I was conscious that the UN Motions on Sri Lanka would be reviewed in March 2019 by the UNHCR in Geneva.I decided I should try to initiate a debate as near to Independence Day on February 4th as I could. After all it is nearly four years since these resolutions were passed; being originally moved by the USA and the UK and co-sponsored by the Government of Sri Lanka who welcomed help.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under accountability, centre-periphery relations, democratic measures, foreign policy, historical interpretation, Indian Ocean politics, life stories, LTTE, politIcal discourse, power politics, propaganda, reconciliation, refugees, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, social justice, sri lankan society, tamil refugees, truth as casualty of war, unusual people, vengeance, world events & processes

The House of Lords Debate on Sri Lanka and the UNHCR resolution

FROM An Eye in the Ceiling: “Sri Lanka’s UNHRC Resolution”

Lord Naseby

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, following the resignation of the government of the United States from the United Nations Human Rights Council where they co-sponsored with the United Kingdom Resolution 30/1 in 2015 and Resolution 34/1 in 2017, in regard to Sri Lanka, and given the progress made towards many aspects highlighted in the resolutions, what assessment they have made of whether to annul or withdraw those resolutions.

Continue reading

Leave a comment

Filed under accountability, american imperialism, British imperialism, centre-periphery relations, cultural transmission, democratic measures, disparagement, politIcal discourse, power politics, Rajapaksa regime, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, slanted reportage, sri lankan society, the imaginary and the real, truth as casualty of war, UN reports, unusual people, war reportage, world events & processes