Since I had been introduced to the British peer Lord Michael Naseby in the surrounds of the House of Lords in March 2018, I assumed that he had been born into the aristocratic upper layer of British society. Wrong. It required his book Sri Lanka for me to learn that he was from the upper middle class and had contested parliamentary seats from the late-960s on behalf of the Conservative Party in what were Labour strongholds – with his peerage being of 1990s vintage. As vitally, his early career as a marketing executive had seen him working in Pakistan and Bengal in the early 1960s before he was stationed in Sri Lanka as a marketing manager for Reckitt and Colman in the period 1963-64.
Filed under accountability, atrocities, communal relations, cricket for amity, economic processes, Eelam, energy resources, ethnicity, foreign policy, governance, historical interpretation, human rights, IDP camps, Indian Ocean politics, island economy, landscape wondrous, language policies, law of armed conflict, Left politics, legal issues, life stories, LTTE, mass conscription, nationalism, photography, political demonstrations, politIcal discourse, power sharing, prabhakaran, Rajiv Gandhi, refugees, security, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, Sri Lankan cricket, suicide bombing, Tamil migration, tamil refugees, Tamil Tiger fighters, terrorism, transport and communications, travelogue, truth as casualty of war, unusual people, war crimes, war reportage, welfare & philanthophy, world events & processes