H. L. D. Mahindapala, in Colombo Telegraph, January 2020, where the title is
Any critical assessment of President Gotabaya Rajapaksa must take into consideration the salient characteristics that make him stand out from the run-of-the-mill politicians who had occupied the peaks of power.
The first notable characteristic is that he is the first head of state to come from the Sri Lankan diaspora. Initially it was a disadvantage tangled in legalities of citizenship. Later it smoothened out and has been an invaluable asset to him. His existential experiences as an expat in America had widened his horizons and opened up new vistas in his thinking and strategizing. He has acted so far as a leader who had seen the future and is bent on taking the nation in that direction. It has all the signs of being influenced by the American efficiency in delivering goods and services. The new breed of intellectuals he had recruited to run his state indicates clearly that he is in a hurry to modernise the sluggish nation and usher it into the 21st century. His first-hand knowledge of an advanced nation would hasten him to mix tradition with modernity without deracinating the nation – a critical issue in modernising Afro-Asian countries.
Filed under american imperialism, communal relations, economic processes, electoral structures, foreign policy, governance, historical interpretation, landscape wondrous, legal issues, life stories, patriotism, politIcal discourse, power politics, prabhakaran, Presidential elections, Rajapaksa regime, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, sri lankan society, Tamil civilians, unusual people, world events & processes
Arvind Subramanian, in Project Syndicate on 19 November 2019 [check?] at https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/sri-lanka-economic-instability-argentina-by-arvind-subramanian-2019-11 … where the title is “Is Sri Lanka the Next Argentina?”
As Sri Lanka makes another crucial political transition, it faces a major risk of macroeconomic instability. Minimizing that risk will depend, above all, on whether the country’s newly elected president, Gotabaya Rajapaksa, can defy his reputation and embrace inclusive politics.
Lady Justice reading a book
Filed under accountability, american imperialism, centre-periphery relations, doctoring evidence, economic processes, governance, historical interpretation, human rights, Indian Ocean politics, island economy, legal issues, life stories, politIcal discourse, power politics, Presidential elections, Rajapaksa regime, reconciliation, self-reflexivity, Sinhala-Tamil Relations, slanted reportage, sri lankan society, the imaginary and the real, truth as casualty of war, welfare & philanthophy, world events & processes
Fair Dinkum, an Aussie Academic with Far Eastern Connections, serves up a Set of Reflections on Dibbert’s Recent Essays
A = Taylor Dibbert maybe a freelance writer but I am sure he is selected because of the perspective he takes. As usual, everything portrays SL’s future as bleak and degenerate.
B = Freelance gives impression of independent writer, but the question is on what criteria do the Lowry Institute accept writings for their website. As a think-tank, the writings they publish are notable for being excessively right-wing, rather than a forum for balanced meaningful intellectual debate and so it should not be regarded as an academic institution. This “freelance” writer fits perfectly into their political agenda.
Filed under accountability, american imperialism, centre-periphery relations, democratic measures, elephant tales, foreign policy, historical interpretation, Indian Ocean politics, life stories, politIcal discourse, Presidential elections, propaganda, Rajapaksa regime, security, self-reflexivity, slanted reportage, sri lankan society, truth as casualty of war, world events & processes