Ball-by-Ball through Wikileaks: US Embassy Despatches from Colombo, 2009: ONE
The issues associated with Eelam War IV and its last stages have drawn a huge array of reports, books, essays, video presentations and commentary. For a single mind to secure mastery of the material is a gargantuan task, well-nigh impossible in fact. Though I have essayed commentary on the topic from early 2009,[1] I meet new facts and useful new contentions on a regular basis.[2]
Recently, this problem has been exacerbated. An old treasure trove has reached me through the good offices of Citizen Silva.[3] This is the result of the espionage work of Julian Assange and those associated with WIKILEAKS: they have disclosed the whole range of American official documents from the Sri Lankan end. My store now has those in the years 2005-2010. As my initial foray I am slowly working through those for the first half of 2009.
Here I introduce a partially distilled summary of selected despatches from US ambassador Robert Blake (or his aides) to their superiors in the State Department in Washington. I do so in temporal sequence. More will follow from time to time. I encourage readers to essay commentary. In due course I will fashion an article myself.
The first pdf file for 2009 is identified in the Wikileaks list as “09COLOMBO03 CONFIDENTIAL.” The number after Colombo – 03 in the above example — changes and thus serves as identification tag. The generality of despatches are marked “UNCLASSIFIED” and a few “SECRET.” I have yet to work out the distinction between “Secret” and “Confidential.” In organising the presentation I have given my own number at the start in serial order and also identified the despatch by the number used after the word COLOMBO; while inserting the date in my preferred style (rather than the American fashion of month prior to day). Those citing the documents from my web-site can, therefore, refer to the first example below as I.1: Despatch 03, 2 January 2009. An example of one of the Wikileaks pdf leak-despatches is presented wholesale at the end of this post.
Where segments have been omitted, a series of dots …… indicates the spot. Words in italics are the headings or sub-headings deployed by the US embassy. I have taken the liberty of highlighting those segments of a despatch that I consider particularly relevant in light red, with deep red highlighting those that are even more noteworthy. Clearly, though, such markings must be read in context, while readers are encouraged to form their own assessments.
Note that on occasions the despatches are sent by the “Charge d’Affaires” — the person who was in charge of the diplomatic mission in the absence of the ambassador, usually the ambassador’s Number Two in the Mission. The despatches also sometimes refer to “Post” meaning the “Diplomatic Post, that is Colombo, Sri Lanka American Embassy” and to “DAO” or Defense Attach Office.”
I.1: Despatch 03, Confidential, dated 2 January 2009
SUMMARY: On the afternoon of January 2, President
Mahinda Rajapaksa announced the much-delayed capture of Kilinochchi on state television. The fall of the LTTE’s administrative capital follows a series of victories for the government on the Northern battlefield in the fall and early winter of 2008. Just an hour after the announcement, a suicide bomber killed an as-yet undetermined number of people outside the headquarters of the Sri Lankan Air Force in downtown Colombo. Early reports indicated at least two dead and as many as 30 injured. The loss of the LTTE’s former capital Kilinochchi is a major defeat for the LTTE who will continue to fight on, and a political boon to the President who may leverage the victory to call for general elections in the coming months. The GSL has predicted the fall of Kilinochchi months ago but the LTTE mounted a stout defense.
As government forces press in on the Tigers’ remaining areas of control, we expect further guerilla attacks on military and economic targets in the South. Without a political solution that meets Tamil aspirations, however, we do not believe the GSL will be able to put an end to Sri Lanka’s 25 year old conflict, because the LTTE will continue to be able to draw on funding from the Tamil diaspora and support within Sri Lanka…
…………..…
Embassy recommends the following if-asked press guidance.
Begin Text
The United States hopes that the military advances made by
Government forces in recent months, including today’s
(apparent) recapturing of Kilinochchi, will help hasten an
end to the 25-year old conflict. The United States continues
to believe that the most important step the Government should
take to end the conflict is a political solution that meets
the aspirations of Tamils, Muslims and Sinhalese. Without a
political solution that will enable the Government to win the
confidence of Tamils both in Sri Lanka and those that fund
the LTTE from the diaspora, a conclusive military victory
will be very difficult. End Text
COMMENT: In recent interviews with Reuters and the
BBC (ref A) LTTE Political Wing Chief Nadesan previewed LTTE
guerilla attacks that he categorized as “defensive”. In
fact, just an hour after the President’s address the
headquarters of the Sri Lankan Air Force in downtown Colombo
was bombed. Early reports indicated two deaths and as many
as 30 civilians were injured in the attack. We expect
similar incidents in the future as government forces press in
on the Tigers in the North. While the government’s victory
in Kilinochchi is significant, the LTTE still retains the
capability to inflict casualties at the front and throughout
the country. In fact, Army Commander Fonseka indicated in
the summer of 2008 that even if the government was able to
secure the entire Vanni the LTTE could easily go underground
with a residual force of 1000 and conduct hit and run attacks
on the military for several years as it attempted to secure
the Vanni. The Tigers’ ability to transform themselves into
an underground insurgent movement in the areas they formerly
controlled is a central reason we will continue to press the
government to engage on a political track. Without political
negotiations with members of the Tamil community that enjoy
respect and legitimacy, a lasting solution to Sri Lanka’s 25
years old conflict will prove elusive, because the LTTE will
continue to be able to draw on funding from the Tamil
diaspora and support within Sri Lanka. End Comment.
Blake
I.2: Despatch 12, Confidential, dated 6 January 2009
A senior Government Minister confirmed to Ambassador
on January 5 that the Government of Sri Lanka (GSL) is likely
to ban the LTTE as early as Wednesday, January 7. Although he
was one of the Ministers involved in lifting the ban in 2002
so the Government could open peace talks with the LTTE, the
Minister confided that recent GSL military successes had
given impetus to JVP, JHU and other Sinhalese nationalists
within the Cabinet who not only want to pursue a military
solution to crush the LTTE, but also want to take advantage
of public support for recent military progress to also pursue
measures to curb Tamil nationalism. The Minister confided
there is no support in the Cabinet any longer for talks with
the LTTE so the proposal to ban the LTTE is likely to be
approved with wide support. However, he expressed concern
about the wider agenda to curb Tamil nationalism which he saw
as an opportunistic move by Sinhalese nationalists to
pre-empt any kind of political solution. He said he and
other moderates in the Cabinets quietly have spoken to
President Rajapakse who thus far remains committed to a
political solution, albeit after the LTTE has been defeated.
2. (C) Ambassador subsequently spoke with Norwegian
Ambassador Hattrem who agreed the GSL was likely to ban the
LTTE in the near future. He said he had urged the GSL not to
take this course since it does not gain the Government
anything. But he assessed that his appeal would have no
impact given the groundswell of support for the idea.
3. (C) Comment: We and other diplomats successfully
persuaded the GSL not to ban the LTTE when this idea came up
in the early and middle part of 2007 with the argument that a
ban would close off the possibility of dialogue with the
LTTE, and that it is always useful to have at least a
backchannel open to talk to the LTTE. However, the GSL never
opened any backchannel and the recent capture of Kilinochchi
(reftel) has reinforced optimism in Government circles that a
military victory over the LTTE is possible and therefore
I.3: Despatch 32, Confidential, dated 2 January 2009
Summary: In a January 8 meeting with President
Mahinda Rajapaksa requested by Ambassador, the President
offered little hope that investigations into recent attacks
on the press would lead anywhere, but agreed to provide
security for two prominent critics. He predicted the Sri
Lankan military would be able to occupy all of northern Sri
Lanka in “a couple of months,” and reaffirmed his
instructions to avoid civilian casualties. He agreed to look
at a UN suggestion to set up camps for IDPs in newly
liberated areas well away from Vavuniya, where serious human
rights violations have occurred, and to consider sending
reassurances to the IDPs that they will be treated according
to international standards and resettled once demining has
taken place. The President confirmed Sri Lanka will organize
Provincial Council elections in the north, along the model of
the Eastern Province, once the Vanni is occupied. He was
more vague about prospects for a serious proposal emerging
from the All Parties Representative Committee, or concrete
ideas for implementing the 13th amendment, which provides for
devolution to the provinces. End Summary.
Need to Protect Press Freedom and Civil Society
——————————————— —
2. (C) Ambassador opened by noting the USG’s condemnation
of the assassination of Morning Leader Editor Lasantha
Wickrematunge. President responded that he also had
condemned the murder and that he considered Wickrematunge a
personal friend. He stated Wickrematunge had invited him to
his wedding, which he had declined for security reasons. But
he said that he and his wife had planned to host
Wickrematunge and his wife for a celebratory dinner. The
Ambassador urged the government to mount a serious
investigation into the killing, particularly given the
allegations that the perpetrators may have been associated
with the government. The president categorically denied any
GSL involvement and noted that he had appointed a special investigative team. He admitted, however, that the police had a poor record in such investigations. For example, it had taken the police two years to determine the owner of the auto-rickshaw that was used in the attempted killing of his brother the Defense Secretary in 2006. The Ambassador responded that the government should make improvements in police capabilities a national priority.
3. (C) Ambassador told the President these latest incidents
against the press are widely seen as attempts to sqaush
dissent in Sri Lanka. The President again denied government
involvement and stressed that Wickrematunge had many enemies
because of his paper’s frequent exposure of corruption and
other misdeeds. The Ambassador urged that the government
provide police protection for Iqbal Athas, a Sunday Times
columnist who reports frequently on the war, and J.C.
Weliamuna, the head of Transparency International in Sri
Lanka and a prominent human rights lawyer. The President
expressed confidence nothing would happen to them. The
Ambassador respectfully disagreed and reiterated the request
for security, which the President agreed to provide.
Reassure IDPs
4. (C) Ambassador asked the President how long it would
take for the Sri Lankan military to completely occupy the
Vanni. Rajapaksa responded that he instructed the military
to take the utmost care to avoid civilian casualties, which
would delay military operations. He anticipated the military
would be able to occupy the North in “a couple of months.”
The Ambassador welcomed the President’s concern about
civilian casualties and urged the GSL to think about ways it
could reassure the 270,000 internally displaced people (IDPs)
in the north so that they would be willing to move into
government-controlled areas. The first challenge would be
for the UN and others to persuade the LTTE to allow freedom
of movement, which thus far it has been unwilling to do. But
another equally serious challenge was fear on the part of the
IDPs of the treatment they might receive at the hands of the
government. Ambassador noted that the UN had proposed to the
Government that the GSL and UNHCR establish camps in
newly-liberated areas of the North that were closer to the lands of the IDPs and well away from Vavuniya where very high
levels of extrajudicial killings, abductions and other human
rights abuses by paramilitaries in the area deter the IDPs
from moving there. The President agreed to look at such an
idea. Disaster Management Minister Samarasinghe agreed, but
noted that more than 1,000 IDPs had moved south to Vavuniya
already, where he claimed human rights abuses had come down
in recent months. The Ambassador also urged that the
government use the radio and leaflets to reassure the IDPs
that they would receive food and other relief in camps that
UNHCR would help to manage, and that they would be resettled
to their original homes as soon as demining could take place.
The President agreed this was a useful idea and asked his
staff to think about air dropping inexpensive radios the IDPs
could use.
Urgent Need for a Political Solution
5. (C) Ambassador noted his concern that military successes
had emboldened Sinhalese nationalists and other hard-liners
to expand their extreme agenda to include abolition of the
All Parties Representative Committee process. The Ambassador
urged the President to state publicly his commitment to a
political solution and spell out the elements of the
government’s strategy in that regard. The President
responded that once the military occupies the north, the
government’s strategy is to duplicate what it did in Eastern
Sri Lanka following the expulsion of the LTTE from that
region. The top priority would be to organize provincial
council elections. Ambassador responded that before the US
and other members of the international community could
consider assistance in resttling (sic) IDPs, we would need to be
assured that political arrangements and the government’s
Chief Minister candidate would enjoy the support of the
Tamils in the north. Social Services Minister Douglas
Devananda for example, would not be a suitable choice because
his paramilitary, the EPDP, had been responsible for the
killings and abductions of large numbers of Tamils in Jaffna.
The Ambassador suggested the GSL consult moderate Tamils
like TULF leader Anandasangaree to find candidates that would
enjoy Tamil support, including from the diaspora. The
President reassured the Ambassador that he was committed to
finding someone who would enjoy the support of the Tamils of
the Vanni, including possibly someone from the diaspora
6. (C) The Ambassador urged that the political strategy also
include a component to address wider Tamil political demands,
such as those ideas now under consideration by the APRC. The
President stated that he was waiting for the APRC to finish
its deliberations. He said he had instructed his aides to
look at establishing a new upper house of Parliament, for
example, to include representatives from each of Sri Lanka’s
25 districts. He also affirmed that the APRC and a separate
committee are working on ways to implement the 13th amendment
(which provides for devolution of power to the provinces).
He noted, for example, his support for giving Provincial
Councils authority over community policing.
Demobilizing Paramilitaries in the East
7. (C) The Ambassador previewed the upcoming visit to Sri
Lanka of PACOM J-5 MGEN Conant, who would also visit the
East. Ambassador took the opportunity to re-state the
urgency of Sri Lanka ensuring that the TMVP release all
remaining child soldiers and stop new recruiting. The
President responded the TMVP has no need for child soldiers
and expressed confidence child soldiers would be released.
Ambassador also urged that all TMVP paramilitary forces over
the age of 18 also be demobilized noting that the USG had a
program with the International Organization of Migration to
provide psycho-social care and vocational training. The
TMVP’s demobilization would mark a major step in bringing
security to the east. The President thanked the USG for such
programs and noted his understanding that the GSL had
arranged for some of the ex-TMVP combatants to obtain
employment in South Korea. Foreign Secretary Kohona asserted
that the recent economic downturn in South Korea might reduce
the number of job offers from Korea.
Comment
8. (C) As always, the President sought to be reassuring, but
offered few concrete assurances on any of the issues of importance to us. It was evident he has not thought through the specifics of what political solution he is prepared to offer, much less when. He remains focused on short-term priorities such as organizing the Central and Northwest Provincial Council elections in February and the war effort, and confident that he continues to enjoy strong support from his Sinhalese base.
Blake.
I.4: Despatch 33, Secret, dated 9 January 2009
SUMMARY: The government of Mahinda Rajapaksa has
achieved considerable success in its military campaign
against the LTTE. The Defense Ministry under his brother,
Secretary Gothabaya Rajapaksa, has had top priority for
funding and other support, and has used this mandate to
transform the Sri Lankan Army into a far more capable
fighting force than previously. As a result, this government
is now closer to expelling the Tigers from the north than
ever before. This will likely initiate a new even more
lethal phase of LTTE terrorism. In addition, the GSL’s
preoccupation with winning the war has contributed to serious
human rights abuses and mounting economic challenges.
Continued terrorism and governance problems underscore the
need for President Rajapaksa’s government to adopt a more
accommodating attitude toward its national minorities,
Muslims and others as well as Tamils. The U.S should be
prepared to assist with stabilizing the northern
Tamil-dominated areas of Sri Lanka after their liberation
from the Tamil Tigers, but we need to approach this
undertaking with considerable caution. We will need to
condition our cooperation on concrete GSL plans to come
forward with a political solution to undercut continued
popular support for the LTTE and empower legitimate Tamil
representatives who enjoy the support of Sri Lankan Tamils.
Embassy recommends that the U.S. work with India, the
Co-Chairs and others to encourage the Sri Lankan government
to launch a quiet political dialogue now with Tamils and
Muslims. We should also be prepared to help locate, detain
and hand over to Sri Lanka or India Prabhakaran and other
senior LTTE leaders should they leave the country. The U.S
should join with others in assisting the return of northern
IDPs, including de-mining assistance. We should consider
ways to leverage new assistance flows to the north, measures
to support new private sector investment from the large and
wealthy Tamil diaspora, duty free access for some limited
range of products from new factories built in the north, and
new AID funds to establish public-private partnerships. End
Military Scenarios: How Long Will It Take?
——————————————-
2. (SBU) The loss of Kilinochchi and the crossroads town
north of it, Paranthan, have rendered LTTE positions on the
southern portion of the Jaffna peninsula untenable. They are
already effectively cut off from the main LTTE forces around
the remaining Tiger bastion of Mullaitivu. The Tigers
anticipated this situation and have withdrawn the bulk of
their cadres and heavy equipment, such as artillery, toward
Mullaitivu.
…. Government ministers have told us that they hope to gain control of Mullaitivu and thereby eliminate the LTTE as a semi-conventional force within two or three months. However, President Rajapaksa told Ambassador on January 8 that it could take several months because he was intent on avoiding large-scale civilian casualties. Our sense is that much stiff fighting remains. The commendable imperative to spare the civilian population will slow progress against remaining LTTE forces. With government troops virtually on
the outskirts of Mullaitivu to the south and west, our
military assessment is that it might be possible to capture
the town – which until now has sheltered relatively few
displaced persons – in about two months, perhaps by
mid-March. But it could be months longer before the GSL is
able to occupy all of the north if the Tigers are able to
maintain their hold over the civilian population under their
control.
4. (C) As Army Commander Fonseka has acknowledged, that will
not end the fighting. The LTTE will likely go underground,
with cadres attempting to blend in with the civilian
population in other parts of Sri Lanka. Some, especially the
leadership, could try to leave by boat while they still hold
Mullaitivu. However, it is not clear where they could go.
India might tolerate a few disarmed ex-cadres washing up on
its shores, but has made clear that it seeks to prosecute the
Tiger leadership for the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. In
any case, we expect a new even more lethal phase of LTTE
terrorism to begin. Absent a political package for Tamils
that is sufficiently credible for Sri Lankan Tamils to stop
providing support to the LTTE – and the Tamil Diaspora to
stop funding the LTTE – the conflict is likely to grind on in
another form.
————————————–
5. (SBU) The conditions for about 300,000 civilians trapped
in the north behind LTTE lines remain serious, and are likely
to get worse as the space they are restricted to becomes
smaller, increasing the risk for higher civilian casualties.
The Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) previously gathered
around Oddusuddan have reportedly moved again, further into
territory still under LTTE control. Others who fled
Kilinochchi have joined many others in the Puthukkudiyiruppu
(PTK) area, which has become extremely crowded. There are a
number of camps along the A35 highway which would be in the
direct path of a further Army advance. Schools and other
facilities are overflowing. With a small number of ICRC
workers in the north, and sporadic, short UN visits, there is
an urgent need for a comprehensive UN needs assessment of
conditions for the IDPs. Humanitarian workers report that
the food supply appears adequate, mainly due to the ten UN
convoys that have made it through to the affected population.
There remain urgent unmet needs for shelter, however.
6. (C) The IDPs remain trapped between two determined foes.
The Government resists a needs assessment because they want
to provide enough food that the IDPs don’t starve, while
keeping conditions difficult enough that the IDPs have an
incentive to move into GSL-controlled areas. The LTTE has
not allowed them to move to Government-controlled areas, in
part so the LTTE can continue forced recruiting, in part
because their presence will slow the Sri Lankan military
progress. The LTTE has been recruiting civilians
aggressively for years. There can be few, if any families
remaining in the LTTE-controlled areas that do not have
members within the LTTE ranks. The small number – in the
hundreds – who have managed to escape the combat theater so
far have generally not been allowed freedom of movement, but
are being held in what amount to internment camps while
screening for LTTE cadres or sympathizers proceeds at a
glacial pace.
7. (C) The UN, ICRC and others who assist the displaced
populations are concerned that applying this policy to
hundreds of thousands of Vanni residents is a recipe for
disaster. The government has prepared reception facilities
for only a few thousand people in Vavuniya, an area where
violent anti-LTTE militias roam at will and commit serious
human rights violations and crimes like robbery and extortion
on a daily basis. The UN is proposing establishing camps
under international monitoring in the western Vanni, closer
to the points of origin of the IDPs. This would be far
enough from the fighting, but close enough to their homes
that people would be more likely to leave LTTE-controlled
areas, if the LTTE permits. We support this idea; government
officials we have spoken to, including President Rajapaksa,
appear willing to consider this.
Internal Political Prognosis
—————————-
8. (C) Domestic (“Southern”) political considerations often
determine the government’s approach to the conflict.
President Rajapaksa received very few minority votes and therefore owes little to Sri Lanka’s minorities. His support
is drawn almost exclusively from the Sinhalese Buddhist
majority, who by themselves can ensure his re-election.
Since his election in 2005, he has felt boxed in by the lack
of a stable parliamentary majority. Unproductive
one-upmanship and mistrust between his SLFP and the main
opposition UNP have been the single most destructive
political trend since the mid 1950s, stalemating any
effective moves toward national reconciliation. A key part
of the President’s support comes from hardline nationalists,
some of whom are in the Sinhalese supremacist parties JVP and
JHU. We do not consider the President to be an extremist,
but there are key figures in his entourage who hold
chauvinist views. We, the Indians and others are worried
about ascendant extremism among Sinhalese nationalists who
have a different agenda: not just defeating the LTTE, but
suppressing Tamil nationalism, hamstringing the effort to
develop a devolution proposal and thereby blocking progress
toward a political solution.
9. (C) The President’s trump card is the success of the
campaign against the LTTE. With his military victories, he
may feel confident enough to call a general parliamentary
election around April 2009. The Provincial Council elections
in two regions on February 14 will be a key test of how deep
the gratitude is within his Sinhalese base for his progress
in ridding the country of the Tigers. If the President’s
pollsters and political advisors assess that the prospects
for improving the government’s position in Parliament are
only fair, he may follow his usual inclination to defer
important decisions and put off the election until later.
Whatever the timing, only if he emerges from an election with
a more stable majority and less dependence on nationalist
forces will he feel comfortable about moving publicly in the
direction of concessions to the minorities.
10. (C) There is reason to be wary about the government’s
willingness to initiate post-conflict political arrangements
in the northern Tamil heartland of Jaffna and the Vanni that
will enjoy the support of Tamils from those areas. The
current government has shown little sensitivity to Tamils’
perceptions of injustice or their long-held aspirations for a
modicum of self-governance in the areas where they
predominate. The government’s track record of delivering on
commitments made to the international community on, for example, the conclusion of the All Parties Representative
Committee, is generally poor. Likewise, it has reneged on
commitments to improve human rights and address its and
previous governments’ almost unbroken failure to bring anyone
to justice for past abuses. While elements of the government
clearly want to engage on this, others are clearly intent on
suppressing dissenting views. The past week alone has seen a
brazen armed attack on a TV transmitting station and the
assassination of an opposition newspaper editor. Perhaps
even more important, the government has repeatedly missed its
own deadlines for presenting a plan for regional power
sharing through the APRC. The committee charged with
developing a proposal has been short-circuited by
interference from the President himself; the process stalled
a year ago and has become a sham.
A Political Solution: the New “Peace Process”
———————————————
11. (C) The Government’s steady military successes have
ended its support for any talks or negotiations with the
LTTE. The GSL’s decision to ban the LTTE earlier this week
marked the final nail in coffin for negotiations with the LTTE. Since the LTTE very soon will not control territory and will likely increase terrorism, it is no longer credible for the international community to call for talks with the LTTE. We are more than ever convinced, however, that the GSL must now put forward a plan for national reconciliation that includes measures to address Tamil political demands within a united Sri Lanka, and an improvement in human rights. Otherwise, the LTTE is likely to be able to carry on a terrorist campaign with support from diaspora Tamils for years to come. The President, in his speech after the fall of Kilinochchi, characterized it as a victory over the LTTE, not of one ethnic group over another. He has previously stated that once the fighting stops, he will work towards a solution that takes into account the concerns and rights of all Tamils. However, the President is under pressure from the Sinhalese nationalist camp to move away from a political solution. A senior minister told us that the President remains committed to making an offer to the Tamils but does not want to get into a debate with Sinhalese nationalists now, while the battle continues in the north, and before the February 14 Provincial Council elections.
12. (C) The missing political track represents a
considerable threat to Sri Lanka’s future stability. Another
crucial, but missing element is that of possible alternative
leadership credible to Northern Province Tamils. The
government will be tempted to install as Chief Minister of
the Northern Province a “quisling” Tamil so it can try to
micro-manage the north. One eager candidate to become the
new Chief Minister of the Northern Province is Eelam Peoples’
Democratic Party leader Douglas Devananda, a notorious
villain who earned his place on the USG’s visa watch list for
his sponsorship of extrajudicial killings. We have warned
the President and his Government that since Devananda would
not enjoy popular Tamil support, his installation as Chief
Minister would limit U.S. ability to engage and support
stabilization of the north. The President and most GSL
interlocutors understand that U.S. cannot support an
undemocratic, authoritarian, quisling regime in the north.
We have encouraged them to engage the few Tamil moderates who
have not been killed by the LTTE – such as two former
Parliamentarians, Anandasangaree of the Tamil United
Liberation Front and Siddharthan of the People’s Liberation
Organization of Tamil Eelam – to help find candidates
acceptable to Vanni Tamils. Note: these figures enjoy
little popular support and are themselves unlikely to be able
to fill the leadership vacuum.
The Coming Fiscal Squeeze
————————-
13. (C) In 2008, the government showed little inclination to
take the advice of Western donor countries on board.
Instead, it relied on assistance from non-traditional
sources, including low interest loans from China and generous
credit terms for oil imports from Iran. However, the drop in
oil prices will limit Iran’s future generosity and China is
also experiencing an economic slowdown. Fiscal pressures are
mounting. Sri Lanka drew down its foreign exchange reserves
in a failed attempt to defend the rupee against the dollar.
The country’s export industries, including tea, garments and
rubber, as well as tourism, are hurting. Remittances from
workers abroad, a lifeline for the country’s balance of payments, are falling, a trend that is likely to accelerate.
Sri Lanka’s deteriorating fiscal position will be compounded
by an inability to access international capital markets to
finance its deficit, officially budgeted at 6.5% of GDP for
- The global credit crunch will eventually hit all the
harder because of the failure of the state-owned petroleum
company, acting on an interim order from the Supreme Court,
to honor oil hedging contracts with several foreign banks.
Both private companies and, especially, government-owned
enterprises will generally be unable to obtain import
financing on normal commercial terms as a result, a trend
that has already started. The GSL will find itself unable to
finance northern reconstruction and will seek help from the
international community. This presents both problems and
opportunities for U.S. policy.
What the U.S. Should Do
———————–
14. (S) As we look ahead, we recommend that the U.S. work
with India, the Co-Chairs and others to:
— Encourage the Sri Lankan government to launch a quiet
political dialogue now with Tamils and Muslims so the
Government is ready to announce its strategy for a political
solution once the fighting is over in the next several
months. (Note: the GSL has rebuffed our public and private
suggestions to announce a political solution now because it
thinks this might signal weakness as the military wraps up
fighting in the north.) At a minimum, its strategy should
include a timetable and plan for elections to elect a new
Provincial Council that enjoys the support of northern
Tamils; a concrete timetable for completing the APRC process,
which the international community should be prepared to
encourage the opposition UNP and other parties to support,
provided it is credible; and measures to ensure credible
devolution of power to the provinces consistent with the 13th
amendment.
— Be ready to engage to help rebuild the post-conflict
North, provided we have assurances on several key matters
First, we must be confident that arrangements for local
elections in the north enjoy the support of northern Tamils.
Second, the government must be prepared to move quickly, with
international help, to return the Vanni IDPs to their homes
and lands. Third, the GSL must launch a process with UNHCR
and Muslims displaced from Jaffna to allow those Muslims to
return to their homes if they choose, once demining has taken
place.
The U.S. also should:
— Be prepared to help locate, detain and hand over to Sri
Lanka or India Prabhakaran and other senior LTTE leaders
should they leave the country, particularly if a credible
timetable and plan for a political solution that meets Tamil
demands has been put forward.
— Beyond plans for assisting the return of northern IDPs,
consider ways to leverage new assistance flows to the north,
which has suffered from years of under-investment and
neglect, not to mention the damage from recent fighting. The
most immediate need will be to assist in what is likely to be
a massive de-mining task, which must precede resettlement and
development activities. We also recommend S/CRS be prepared
to deploy an assessment team to consider a USG-supported
stabilization and development program. Beyond that, we
recommend consideration of other measures to support new
private sector investment, particularly from the large and
wealthy Tamil diaspora. One idea would be duty free access
for some limited range of products from new factories built
in the north. Another would be new AID funds to establish
public-private partnerships that can leverage potentially
significant private sector investments.
Blake
*****
NOTES
[1] Several of these essays are available in Roberts, Fire and Storm, Colombo, Yapa Publications, 2010 (ISBN ….) and in Roberts, Tamil Person and State: Essays, Colombo, Yapa Publications, 2014.
[2] For instance, see Issues of Truth and Accountability. The Last Stages of the War, Colombo, Marga Institute & Consortium of Humanitarian Agencies, 2014. Try info@margasrilanka.org andwww.margasrilanka.org …. And … info@cha.lk and http://www.humanitarian-srilanka.org.
[3] Principal author of IDAG, The Numbers Game: Politics of Retributive Justice, 2013, available at http://www.margasrilanka.org/ OR http://www.scribd.com/doc/132499266/The-Numbers-Game-Politics-of-Retributive-Justice.
“Social Services Minister Douglas Devananda for example, would not be a suitable choice because his paramilitary, the EPDP, had been responsible for the killings and abductions of large numbers of Tamils in Jaffna. The Ambassador suggested the GSL consult moderate Tamils
like TULF leader Anandasangaree to find candidates that would
enjoy Tamil support, including from the diaspora”.
The NCP elections in 2013 showed that those who were voted in are just the kith and kin, i.e., descendents of those who were in power after the Donoghmore commission in the 1930s, in 1948, 1952, 1956, etc., all the way up to 1977.
There has been no change in the Tamil governing clique. There has been no opportunity for new leaders to appear among the Northern voters – most of the TNA members of parliament are Colombo-resident absentee landlords of the North, almost all of them (except Anandasangaree) having been close supporters of the LTTE.
This is not surprising because the LTTE had suppressed or decimated all new Tamil political leaders arsing among the Northern residents. It will take at least a generation before new leadership, and new money raised close to the people,can create some type of de facto democracy in the North.
If you carefully read the Diplomatic Cables sent from the US Embassy, Colombo Sri Lanka to Washington, one could see that the State Department, despite its total disapproval of the Tiger terrorism and rejection of a separate Tamil state, was pressing on a political solution to what it believed was the ‘Tamil National Question’. The State Department and its foreign service officers (FSOs) strongly believed since the 80s that the minority Tamils in Sri Lanka faceda certain discrimination in many fields such as education and employement and that the emergence of the LTTE was due to the successive Sri Lankan regimes failure to address these issues. The terminology, choice of words and ‘comments’ at almost every diplomatic cable gives that impression, and encouraged to have a dialogue to resolve the ‘Tamil National Question’. The US has not changed its position even now – post war – when one sees the manner in which it handles Sri Lanka in UNHRC and in Washington. In fact, some cables, one will see, the US did not want the LTTE totally annihilated, in my opinion to maintain it as a pressure group to get the GSL to effect changes in Sri Lanka. Daya Gamage/Asian Tribune
Pingback: WikiLeaks reveals that US embassy in Sri Lanka was ill-informed | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Revisiting Eelam War IV | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: After the Battles: Tammita-Delgoda’s Images from the War Theatre | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Saving Talaivar Prabhākaran: Fr. Gaspar Raj’s Revelations in 2010 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: KP’s Frantic Efforts to Save the Tiger Leaders in 2009 … and USA’s Pursuits | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Triuth Journalism? Marie Colvin hoist on her own Petard | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Marie Colvin an example of how people end up supporting terrorists and campaigning for terrorists | TERRORIST NADAGAM
Pingback: From MICHAEL ROBERTS, Anthropology, Adelaide University to SANDRA BEIDAS of OHCHR |
Pingback: The war in Sri Lanka and propaganda debates: An analysis for the OHCHR in Geneva | Lankan Expats
Pingback: The War in Sri Lanka and Propaganda Debates | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: David Miliband’s Imperious Intervention in Lanka left in Tatters | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Thoughts on de Silva-Ranasinghe’s Concise Delineation of the LTTE Defeat in Eelam War IV | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Moving to War: Critical Events that hardened Mahinda Rajapaksa’s Resolve in 2006 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Past in the Present: Deciphering the Cosmological Threads in Sri Lankan Politics | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: HRW in Syria and Sri Lanka: Moral Fervour generating Political Blindness and Partisanship | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: HRW in Syria and Sri Lanka: Moral Fervour generating Political Blindness and Partisanship | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Targeting Lanka by Playing Ball with Tamil Extremism: 2008-14 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The Gash Files II: LTTE’s Strategic Design | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The Gash Files III: Trapped Tamils Out by Sea in 2009 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The Gash Files IV: The War on Land in the Final Five Months | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Reflections: Interpreting the Gash Files IV | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Piercing the LTTE’s Last Redoubt: THE HINDU Reportage, 21-30 April 2009 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The Bogollagama Gem: Thoughts on the Threatening US Spectre in March-May 2009 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Where USA sought to arm-wrestle Sri Lanka in March-April-May 2009 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Ambassador Blake in Never-Never-Land: Misreading LTTE Capacity in Early 2009 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: How Mahinda Rajapaksa rebuffed David Miliband | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: USA’s Threatening Interventions during the Eelam War in 2009 | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Which Rajapaksa in 2020 – Mahinda contesting bogey to end JO ‘candidate crisis’? : Athirady English News
Pingback: The Lines of Fire within Mark Field’s Paternalist Message | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The Western World’s Cumulous Clouds of Deception: Blanketing the Sharp Realities of Eelam War IV | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Tangram’s Study of the Tamil Tigers enters our world | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Gamage reveals USA’s Strategic Goals in the Indian Ocean and Sri Lanka’s Place via 2007 Robert Blake Cables | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Finger-lickin’ Good: USA’s Assessment of Mangala Samaraweera | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: UNHRC in Geneva: Its Partisanship revealed in Summary Statement from Lord Naseby | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: The US Embassy in Colombo: Its Internal Structures and Lines of Responsibility | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Riddled with Deceit and Fallacy: The Western World’s Appraisal of Eelam War IV | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: USA’s Imperialist Advances by Stealth? Goodness Gracious Me! | Thuppahi's Blog
Pingback: Embracing the LTTE Strategy in 2008/09: Norway, USA, UK, France and the Human Rights Conglomerate as Complicit Tiger Allies | Thuppahi's Blog